Monday, August 25, 2014

Sunday, June 8, 2014

Technology, Methods, and ME!!!

You know that moment when you don't want to admit that you've bitten off more than you can chew? Yeah, that's my website. To clarify, the task that I set for myself is certainly long term possible, but will definitely require me putting in time on a regular basis. I had wanted to have every video on my website closed captioned for this final project, but that will be done around the time that junior up there finishes his snack. :-D

So, my website is located at: http://www.mrsbsworld.com/triangulartools.html

I had originally coded the site in ETEC 500 and have been adding to it off and on throughout the course of the school year. I added the section that the link above takes you to as part of my project for ETEC 644, but the component that I completed for my final project for this class was the closed captioning/subtitles/why do I talk so fast to my how to solve videos. The videos to which I added captioning are all 3 sine videos, tangent video 2, and the 30-60-90 special right triangle video.

Things I learned from this process:
   1) I talk TOO fast. I was trying to speak slowly in the videos. Yeah, go ahead and:
    
2) Technology saves SO MUCH time... when you know how to actually use it.

 

The videos that I captioned show a progression. If you watch the tangent video, the 30-60-90 and the second sine video, you'll see one type of captioning. I did all of this screen by screen checking the timing and putting in my own annotation text boxes. I shall confine myself to say that this took an excessive amount of time. Then, I somehow magically got the add captions selection to work in camtasia. (I had previously tried and it was shaded out so that I didn't have access.) I captioned that video MUCH more quickly and went to add captions to the last sine video and couldn't match what I had done at first. I'm pretty sure that it has something to do with selecting the recording in some particular way. I'll play with it more later but for now, stop changing the Google on me!

3) This is not the sort of process that you can complete on your own in an hour or two to make really nice, high quality videos. There are issues with phrasing in my videos. There are issues with background noises (a special "shout out" to my darling children, darling husband and Hiccup, the dog...). There are locations in my video where a letter just magically disappears, where did it go? I think it's with all the socks...

These are the real things that take time, know how, and a crazy amount of effort to erase either through re-recording or more technology know how than I have currently. Don't get me wrong, my videos aren't bad; I just can't help but watch them and find detail after detail that makes me want to cover my eyes.


4) This process of video creation is something that I want to bring into my own classroom practice. Ha ha students! Look at what I had to go through and now you do, too! No, that's not why. I just have seen the ways I could have perfected the language, planned more, been more specific, built more structure, I could go on but I think that I have made my point. In having my students create videos, I will be affording them the time to really focus their attention and refine something. I am looking forward to exploring some of the free extensions on my google chrome books with my students (we video and pic monkey to name a few) to bring their learning to the next level.


Thanks for everything this quarter Dr. Newberry!

Michelle

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Session 9 - I have confirmation that Dr. Newberry is a mind reader!

In applying the skills we have been learning to my own class, I have been considering many of the very things that Dr. Newberry has asked for us to type about this week. Therefore, I must conclude that he is not using the weak spell Legilimens to read my thoughts, we must have entered into a full on Vulcan, wait for it, MindMeld!!!

All kidding aside, thank you for asking questions which give me additional time to really consider the application in my own classroom.


1.     Identify three different technologies that support discussions in online classes. Describe each technology in terms of its ability to support worthwhile and rewarding discussions.
Technology #1: Schoology Discussion Forum
The Schoology Discussion Forum as seen below allows for students to have student-to-student interaction. While students could conceivably be online at the same time and posting back and forth in real time, this ideally situated as an asynchronous discussion technology that allows each individual student to engage with the question and with each other in a blackboard style setting. The ability to work at any time and from any location (Schoology even has smartphone apps from which students may engage), edit their work and consider the posts of others work together to promote quality discussion from all students. 

Technology #2: Blog Responses to Questions
Like the Schoology discussion forums, blogs (google or otherwise) allow for student to engage student-to-student and student-to-content asynchronously so that students can work in their own time and place of most comfort. Unlike the Schoology discussion forum, the blog of each individual is housed wherever they keep their blog. But, if like Dr. Newberry, an instructor keeps a list of links with the blog of each student attached available, students can readily navigate from blog to blog to interact with their fellow students. The benefits of the blog over the discussion is that the individual contributions of each student are kept more visibly distinct so that each person is able to maintain their own, more distinct, discussion on their page.
Technology #3: Google Docs – Comments and/or Chat
Finally, a third and final technology for discussions would be Google Docs. Google Docs have both an option for commenting and/or chat amongst members with whom the document is shared. The greatest benefit to this particular technology is that while it works very nicely as an asynchronous discussion area (anyone with document access is able to show a revisions history to see what has been done and when) with particular areas highlighted with comments (or not) by contributors, it has the added advantage of working nicely as a synchronous technology via chat should group members so desire.
2.     Describe an eLearning context (type of class, students, and specific content) where you would advocate the use of an online discussion. Identify the technology you would use to facilitate the discussion.
I have already been working to pull together the online aspect of my AP Statistics course for the upcoming 2014-2015 school year. As stated, the course is AP Statistics, which means that it is a college level class in Statistics (not calculus based). The 89 students enrolled in the course are predominantly self-motivated seniors, but there exists a handful of juniors and even a sophomore or two. The online aspect of this course (from what I have discerned through informal interviews) will be relatively new to these students, though many have worked with blogs in English or history or both over the course of the past school year.
I discovered last year that my AP Stats students were NOT well-equipped to read the college level text and discern that which was important from that which was less critical, nor were they proficient or persistent in seeking sources to illuminate the topics they did not understand. It is for the purpose of helping them to read, understand, and interact with the text, their classmates, and myself that I am choosing to use discussion with these students.
As shown above in either the blog picture or google docs picture, my students (very like what we do for this class) have a series of question with which they need to engage for each chapter through a blog post. They will answer these questions with the help of the text and outside sources from their own vantage point and then visit at least 3 other blogs and either leave feedback or ask questions which demonstrate the extension of their learning.
3.     Describe how you would plan for the discussion described in question 2. For example, how would you prepare students for the discussion, structure associated presentations, plan other activities that students be doing along with the discussion, and how you would ensure that the student workload was balanced and appropriate.
To prepare for the aforementioned blog discussion, students will read the weekly assigned readings. As I am just beginning to start with this application in my coursework, students will primarily engage with the text. In the long run, I’d like to add videos, powerpoints/prezis, articles, etc. to add dimension to the material and support any weak points or add extensions to the chapters to guarantee quality student preparation.
The blog questions for each chapter will be posted (along with the due date and rubric) on the schoology website. Students have already come to an informational lunch time meeting with me where they were 1) walked through the Schoology website, 2) shown how to use the calendar to keep track of due dates, 3) shown how to access the questions for each blog and 4) shown the organization of the folders so that they know where their assignment papers, etc. are housed.
Last year, I assigned more practice problems from the book to give the students assigned, structured time to engage with the material. I have reduced the number of assigned problems as the blog questions allow the students the structured time to engage with the application of the vocabulary in a much more fluid and dynamic manner, those questions have been stricken from the assignment to allow the students time to actually read and complete their blog.
4.     Develop a set of guidelines or policies that you would give to students to help them engage successfully in the discussion.
To begin with, I am borrowing Dr. Newberry’s rubric for grading the blog posts (THANKS Dr. Newberry!) and I intend to revise as necessary to inspire the best work from my students. I also intend to have an in class unit in which we discuss netiquette for both their published work and also for their interaction with other students. (From my trial run of blogging with my current set of AP Stats students, I have found that many lack an academic register when typing for the Internet because they had never considered aught else. They need to learn to distinguish from their typical social media posting style.
The merged social media of the future where no one has to split their time...
As with my rubric, my netiquette guidelines will be something I start with and expect to modify to suit the needs of my students and myself over time. I rather liked these heavily stolen from Boise State:

Be respectful!
Be polite!
Be open-minded!
Don’t argue!
No complaining!
Write properly!
Spell Correctly!
Avoid slang!
No lol’s!
No cursing!
Show pride!
No advertising!
Don’t gossip!
Don’t spam!
Be fair!

1)   Exercise Proper Manners
We all know the golden rule for how to treat others and that is how you want to be treated. It is normal to disagree, as we all perceive things based on our experiences, influences and reasoning skills. You may be wrong about your ideas sometimes and right about them at other times. In fact, there may be no right or wrong answer in some contexts. Also, choose your words carefully as online communications are easily misinterpreted. Please be objective and understanding of other's input at all times. If you don't have anything nice to communicate then don't communicate at all.
2)   Control Your Emotions
We all have bad days - it's a part of life. Everyone is dealing with unique circumstances in their life, both good and bad. Sometimes it is difficult to control your emotions. However, online communications is not the appropriate arena to display negative feelings and ideas. Often, the emotions that consume us are temporary - our good will and better judgment prevails and our feelings change once again. Don't make the mistake of communicating your feelings online, only to later regret it. Once you communicate something in writing it becomes permanent and easily distributed to many. Control your emotions in online communications and avoid the embarrassing consequences.
3)   Be Professional
Remember that first and foremost, every single thing you write or produce in this class is tended towards producing success on the AP Stats test and in college in years to come. When communicating online, it is important to write in a way that can be easily understood. Be careful not to write in the manner in which you speak. Verbal communication offers simultaneous, two-way interaction that enables misunderstandings to be resolved in real-time. Online communications does not afford us the opportunity to clarify our thoughts instantly. A lot of productivity can be lost in online communications as we wait on responses for clarity. For this reason, it is important to form sentences properly and avoid misspelled words. Also, avoid the use of slang and short-cut acronyms, as others may not be familiar with such words or phrases. Cursing is absolutely prohibited. Take pride in your writing and how you represent yourself. Choosing not to be professional may create a negative reflection of your work and character.
4)   Do Not Spam
Online communications offer the ability to broadcast a message instantly to many people, thus it is a popular way of communicating upcoming events, news and promotions. Although it may be convenient for some people, spamming in general is considered a bad practice. Spamming is unsolicited communication and is neither appropriate nor fair to those who did not express an interest in receiving such messages. It is opportunistic behavior that offers nothing to the academic foundation in which these online communications services are intended for. Please do not waste your time and other's time communicating anything that is not relevant to the content in which you are required to learn
5)   Don’t Over Do It
Online communication is not intended to replace traditional forms of communication. There will always be situations that warrant verbal dialogue. If there is something you don't understand that is complex in nature, it may be appropriate to go to your teacher or seek the support of other students. Do not spend a lot of time typing a message that is long and detailed - it wastes your time and the recipient's time. Also, it is not appropriate to copy and paste large amounts of text inside the body of a message. Please place large text, including graphics, in another document and attach it to your message. Following this simple rule allows messages, particularly messages with many replies, to be navigated and read more easily.
5.     Describe and/or develop a system for assessing student participation and learning in the discussion.
As previously stated, I intend to start the year using Dr. Newberry’s own rubric for grading our discussion posts as seen below:
Each blog post is worth up to 10 points according to the following:
10 points: Post is made before required deadline, is well written, and appropriately addresses any topics raised by the instructor or discovered through your own investigation of course-related topics, response may include the use of graphics, images and/or links to information related to the topics of the course that bring quality content into the course environment.
8 - 9 points: Post is made before required deadline, is well written and adequately addresses any topics raised by the instructor or your own investigation into course-related topics.
0 - 7 points: Post is made late and/or the post is poorly written or inadequately addresses course related topics.

As this is a new teaching methodology for me, I would like to work into is slowly. Over the course of the summer, the students will learn to work the blog and how to interact with the text and material in such a way as to learn the material from the readings and additional resources.
Once we return to school in August, I have slated time to work with the students (via the Chromebook cart that is being added to my classroom) to develop an understanding of how to leave meaningful feedback for their classmates. (I really do NOT want to read, variations of good job or nice work over and over again as it, I am sure, becomes frustrating and often is not true.) I would like to work with the students to develop a framework for what constitutes good questions, feedback comments and responses so that they have a) considered it thoroughly, b) understand why the framework is what is and c) take ownership.
6.     How would you prepare the instructor for participating in the discussion?
As the instructor, I will work to model quality feedback, questions, etc. to the students through the first two blogs, which the students will be completing over the summer. Additionally, I need to make sure that I am prepared to find or create additional materials to answer questions that I have not anticipated in both the content and creation of their work. Finally, as the instructor, I need to be prepared to help students grow to meet the guidelines of posting over time as they are all relatively new to the online classroom environment.

Final Project

I am still working to record, caption and, sadly, reshoot the "how-to" videos of my triangular tools website. This worked out nicely as my students said they'd like the videos captioned in my formative evaluation with them.

I have been struggling with whether or not I should just use a weekly type site to set up my site or continue to code it myself. On the one hand my current site is obviously home created and lacks professional polish, but on the other, I like having complete control and access to my site. More to come in the future!

Michelle

Sunday, May 25, 2014

Annotated Bibliography and Final Project Ideas - (Reverse)^2

Final Project Ideas

First and foremost, I'd like to say that the quarters I've completed thus far in the program have furnished me with a WEALTH of ideas from which to choose as I begin to mentally prepare major adjustments for my instruction with my students in the upcoming 2014-2015 school year and while I do have these ideas, I find myself most strongly pulled to my AP Stats class (in comparison to my geometry classes) as I feel that this is an audience a) more ready to take on the challenges inherent in embracing online learning for the first time (more motivated group, they're older and have had more time to learn to juggle school and other considerations and also have had more technology in education experience) and b) it is the smaller of the 2 groups (2 sections of 85ish students total versus 3 sections of 115ish students total) so it makes it easier on the instructor (I really like this chick; she's a hard worker, but deserves the time to make mistakes and learn from them with a more forgiving group...).

While I wish I had time for both of the first two options and the third and will, likely, end up completing all 3, I know myself too well. The second option, develop a course outline, is the one that I really NEED to do, but I won't be able to complete it well enough for myself to be satisfied with what I'd have to turn in at the end. The full year course of AP stats and the interactions I'd like to work into the course are percolating in my mind and already (some of them, summer homework here we come!) coming to fruition. What I need most is to complete it over the course of a year so I can adjust as I see and learn from the mistakes that I've made with my students. (I've already started formatting my class with the Schoology LMS for next year from previous investigation we did.)

Therefore, ultimately, I think I'll be combining my project from ETEC 644 with the work for this class final. For my ETEC 644 project I am working to build (SLOWLY and over MUCH TIME) a website that my students can visit and interact with to better understand how to choose from and apply the various triangular tools they learn over the course of the year in high school Geometry. (triangle angle sum theorem, pythagorean theorem, sine, cosine, tangent, sine inverse, cosine inverse, tangent inverse, 30-60-90 special right, 45-45-90 special right, law of sines and law of cosines)

My project will be the work of making each of these presentations high quality and ADA compatible (something which I had previously planned to "wimp out" on...) So, at the end of my final project for both I'll have diagrams for students to choose from and practice, and how to solve videos that are both captioned in and of themselves, but that also have text documents of the transcript from each video.

I would love to hear from you all with any feedback you have to make this project better because I want it to be AMAZING for my students.

Have a great one!

Michelle

Annotated Bibliography

Citation:
Eseryl, D., Law, V. Ifenthaler, D., Xun, G., & Miller, R. (2014). An Investigation of the
Interrelationships between Motivation, Engagement, and Complex Problem Solving in Game-based Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 42-53.

Summary:
            The purpose of this study was to investigate how the connections between complex problem solving, motivation, and engagement in the context of game-based learning could be used to guide future studies and instructional design efforts surrounding game-based learning. The previously completed research was summed up by the authors as, “games are problems being solved by players [and games are engaging]; therefore playing games will help [and motivate] people be better problem solvers (p.42).”
            The researchers hypothesized that the following factors would have a positive effect on students’ engagement: a) degree of interest, b) student’s perceived competence, c) perceived autonomy, d) relatedness, and e) self-efficacy for the tasks during game play. Additionally, the researchers made a second hypothesis assuming that the students’ engagement and prior ability to address a complex problem would have a positive effect of his/her ability to address a complex problem.
            Researchers concluded that degree of interest and student’s perceived competence actually negatively predicted engagement as students lost interest fairly quickly (when comparing the game to commercial products), but continued with high engagement as it was the only required course activity. They also concluded that perceived autonomy and relatedness had no impact on student engagement for good or ill. Researchers were, however, able to conclude that self-efficacy did have a positive impact on engagement and that engagement and prior ability to address a complex problem did have a positive effect on their future ability to address a complex problem.

Review:
            While the researchers were, unfortunately, unable to use the results of the experiment to support many of their hypotheses in regards to engagement, the paper is noteworthy in that the researchers were among the first to move to address the lack of literature concerned with empirically validating generally accepted, though untested suppositions in regards to game-based learning. Instructional designers need to, whenever possible, base their work in researched methods to help instructors (whether the designer is the instructor or not) help their students engage with the material in methods that will bring the greatest positive change in learning; this study allows for designers to now conclude that, unsurprisingly, it is important to sustain student motivation over time during gameplay in game-based learning.




Citation:
Downes, J. M., & Bishop, P. (2012, May). Educators engage digital natives and learn from their experiences with technology. Middle School Journal, 6-15.

Summary:
            The purpose of this study was to illustrate the engagement of middle grades students’ in a technology-rich AND student-centered classroom environment. The main focus of the paper was to highlight the attributes of the technology integration that, from the perspective of the students, were most engaging. These elements were: reliability for students, accessibility (in a range from students with skill to students with learning gaps), organization that becomes possible with digital access, and the ease of collaboration when Web 2.0 tools are used.
            Additionally, the authors reviewed the implementation of school-wide technology programs and the components necessary for success when undertaking such a large venture. Unsurprisingly, educators who were in an environment with a school culture of trust and collaboration were more willing to take a leap into the gap of the unknown when working to implement technology in the classroom because it constitutes a risk for teachers when they strive to radically alter their teaching to incorporate these tools on a regular basis in a successful way.            Finally, in the implementation of school wide technology programs, the authors found there to be two factors which contributed most to building that school culture of trust and collaboration for teachers. The first factor was that you had to have teachers who were willing to take the risk and spend the time and effort to radically alter their style. The second factor was having school-site and/or district-level leaders who are committed to finding funds for the endeavor and who are willing to make time for ongoing and embedded professional development.

Review:
            As the implementation of the common core state standards (CCSS) gets closer and closer to full implementation (we go full bore with the 2014-2015 school year), the discussions around implementation of technology in the classroom environment have shifted from a focus of questions like: could you try? have you considered? perhaps, someday, you might incorporate… to questions like: what technology are you incorporating in your classroom? Or how have you prepared students for the new testing environment?  This is especially true for the mathematics and English classrooms as it is our two subjects that have full implementation of the common core next year.
            With that in mind, I found this article to be particularly helpful to me as the co-lead of my department. This coming year, each teacher in my math department will be given a cart of chrome books to use in their classroom environment on a daily basis. This article serves as an important reminder to myself and the leadership in any school environment that we need to make sure we are structuring collaboration time and working to make teachers as comfortable and prepared as possible or we’re going to be missing both components of the two most important factors for transformational success.





Citation:
O'Sullivan, M. K., & Dallas, K. B. (2010). A Collaborative approach to implementing 21st Century skills in a High school senior research class. Education Libraries , 33 (1), 3-9.

Summary:
The idea for the study was founded when a spate of other, recent studies claimed that high school students are graduating without the necessary basic skills needed to be successful in college or at work. While the authors found no consensus among postsecondary institutes as to what skills are required to consider a student as “ready”, the purpose of their study was to offer one example, a high school research paper class, of how a class can be designed and structured to give high school students a structured opportunity to experience what college level research and writing entails.
            The study details the work done by one English teacher as she partnered with the library media specialist. They worked to teach seniors about the available technology to research from day one. Areas of focus included the ways in which a question can be revised to mapping the connections of an idea to other subject areas to finding support for the ideas that they have about a topic in general.

Review:
            Once again, this article is of interest to those at the high school level as they work to transition to the common core state standards. The CCSS were put together to help teachers answer the question of what it truly means to be college and career ready and to also map out how teachers can build these skills from year to year, expanding on that which the students mastered the previous year in a clearly defined, almost yearly linear progression. This article is a resource to those interested in seeing an example; it serves as a starting off point for ideas. Additionally, I have personally found the article useful as I am working to retool aspects of my AP Stats class to include more outside application and research on the part of the students. I would like for them to be able to research and find papers detailing studies and experiments and report back on what they have found in regards to statistical quality.





Citation:
Watson, J. A., & Pecchioni, L. L. (2011). Digital natives and digital media in the college classroom: assignment design and impacts on student learning. Educational Media International , 48 (4), 307-320.

Summary:
            The purpose of this article was to share the learning experience over time of a group of instructors of health communication as they explored an assignment and how it motivated students to interact with both each other and with the content in a meaningful way. The instructors assigned students to groups (or in the third year had them assign themselves to groups) and had them choose a topic of interest on which to create a documentary. The instructors had a variety of assignments over the course of the 16-week semester from watching and analyzing a professional documentary as a group to teaching them how to shoot different camera angles to requiring them to pull together a 2-minute edited clip to form a basis of understanding on the amount of time editing a video for quality really takes. The remainder of the paper details the flow of the project development over the course of the semester and through that detailed flow the growth of the project over the course of the three years.

Review:
            “Often new media and digital technologies are either demonized or viewed as the panacea for curriculum ills (p.307).” (Watson & Pecchioni, 2011) This was one of my favorite quotes from the article because I have feared too much administrators favoring one or the other end of this spectrum. If I have learned anything over the course of the ETEC program, it has been that technology is not the cure all or the evil; it is merely a tool as so many other things and needs to be considered in the light of the instructional needs of the students. As stated by the authors, they took the student-centered approach in designing their documentary assignment and kept their focus on what would most engage students with each other and the material; a technology-centered approach is bound to fail because it doesn’t view the needs of the students as paramount.




Citation:
Gunn, T. M., & Hollingsworth, M. (2013). The Implementation and Assessment of a Shared 21st Century Learning Vision: A District-Based Approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45 (3), 201-228.

Summary:
            The purpose of this study was to detail the process one district took as they strived to increase the implementation of technology throughout the district. Working with a university, they founded their strategy of technology implementation and “up-ramping” in the existing research on successful change within a system. The ultimate district change design called for substantial professional development (100+hours over the course of a single year) and used a system of surveys and response to measure the change in everything from attitudes to integration of software on a 1 to 5 Likert scale.
            The strongest trends found in the district were 1) older groups of teachers (the groups as young as the 41+ group on up) were least confident in their abilities regardless of their extensive training and 2) the more professional development hours dedicated to information technologies, the better acceptance and efficacy felt/observed by teachers.

Review:
            This article makes an interesting and applicable read for any individual, at any level, involved in a district or university-wide push for technology change. Once more, with the common core standards being fully implemented in my subject in the following year, one of my jobs as lead will be to make sure that my teachers have the time, development and support of the admin and district level team to work to learn, apply, and adapt to all aspects of including technology in the classroom. Being aware of these needs is the first step to actually fulfilling them and I take this role seriously.


Saturday, May 17, 2014

Week 7 - Alternate Assignment

I'd just like to say that my putting this together makes me respect all the work that Dr. Newberry has done in creating our audio files even more than I already did and my respect for voice actors for film and television has increased exponentially. I don't know how many times I made it through most of the recording and then flubbed the ending. Ugh!

Still, I found the process to be INCREDIBLY rewarding and I look forward to the creation of more videos  (over a LENGTHY timeframe) for use in my classroom both by myself and my students. The piece that has bothered me the most since the creation of my first set of how to videos at the start of first semester (for my students) this year was the lack of subtitles. As a visual person, reading the words while hearing them has ALWAYS helped me to increase what I take away and I imagine the same is true for many others.

I had originally tried to take my old video and import it to imovie so that I could add subtitles, but that was a hot mess. I then found camtasia(the pay to play service like my good old friend jing) which was an upgrade because it allowed me to a) add subtitles on top of my screen recorded loveliness and b) allowed me to save it in formats other than swf (the only one allowed by jing). To make it even better they gave me a free 30-day trial! Yay for free!!!

I then thought to just play my old video and record it using camtasia, wham, bam, thank you ma'am done video (once subtitles were added). I even went so far as to try to use my Mac's speech to text function. This is what it gave me:


Scissors
You basically all gratin café or Wednesday which is Dilmus.com/Clear now is the sandwich in the three functions that you want okay so I’m actually look first
Function

This is what I actually said:


Ok, so the first thing you want to do is to go the online graphing calculator website which is demsos.com/calculator. OK. Now what you want to do is decide which of the 3 functions that you are going to look at.

Then I started to really watch and listen to my old video and I HATED it. All these this's and it's... Where was the specificity? Ugh.

So then I rewrote the script, made it more general. It's really hard to be informal when you're typing everything out, but it makes it better for the viewer, so... enjoy!

I'd appreciate any feedback. I may actually buy Camtasia to use in the future and would like to actually use this video for this project again next year. If you're interested in reading about the project, then please click here. I apologize in advance that some of the equation pieces (like parentheses) are missing.

Cheers,

Michelle

Monday, May 5, 2014

Week 6 - How you doin'?

Blog 6 Assessment vs. Evaluation – How are they different?

This blog is dedicated to the wonderful Joey Tribbiani for his unfailing assessment:



1.     What is the difference between assessment and evaluation?
According to the readings set us this week by Dr. Newberry, the main difference between assessment and evaluation is that evaluation carries a judgment of quality, establishment of value or worth along with communication about the significance of the student performance.
In searching for additional documentation, I found this explanation from Duke University that generally meshes with what Dr. Newberry said. The one big difference here was that to them, assessment was not graded.
In my own practice, I have found assessment to jive strongly with Dr. Newberry’s definitions with the following additions/modifications:
1)    I am ALWAYS in assessment mode; the same cannot be said of evaluation. (I am very careful to develop this understanding amongst my students because most feel judged the moment they enter math class.)
2)    I may or may not grade assessment pieces; it will depend entirely on the task at hand. This will even vary to the extent that what is graded in one class may not be graded in another with the same class title.
2.     What are the challenges to assessment and evaluation in eLearning?
The greatest challenges to assessment and evaluation in eLearning, to me personally, are 1) being able to guarantee that the work done was actually a product created by the student being evaluated and 2) being able to guarantee that the student is able to successfully complete the necessary work without external aid (notes, books, Internet queries, etc.) as math is (unfortunately) incredibly performance based. While there is certainly an argument to be made that we live in an age of easy reference, they still need to internalize certain skills.
3.     Explain the possible use of an online portfolio in eLearning.
An online portfolio might be best used in an eLearning situation when students are required to complete a number of individual and team projects. Through the progression of the course, students have an opportunity to build and include a) examples of their work, b) self-evaluations, c) peer evaluations, and d) evaluations completed by the instructor to build a case and show what they have learned and whether they have met the course objectives.
Three benefits of an online portfolio in eLearning are:
1)    A nicely built portfolio allows students to showcase work from various career stages in addition to obtaining reference information,
2)    Portfolio assessment more closely mirrors the type of evaluation students will see in the workplace and prepares them for this eventuality, and
3)    Portfolio assessment lends itself more readily to the type of work that students must produce themselves, not copy from the Internet or peers.
I think the most important phrase used by the author of our text was when she characterized the use of portfolios being best in a student-centered learning environment. This portfolio idea would not work well with much of what you see in a traditional math classroom. Trying to have each student complete the same worksheet with the same tired, old problems would not make for high quality portfolios.
4.     Identify at least two ways to measure student participation in an online class and explain how you think these methods can factor into the students' grade in the course.
Method 1: If using a portfolio in the class, one way to measure student participation would be to have a rubric for grading the quality of the portfolio. A grade is assigned for the quality of each portfolio item, the organization of the portfolio, and for the overall quality of the entire portfolio according to a Numeric Grading Scale like the one below:
10 Excellent Quality Work
·            Far exceeds course requirements
·            Demonstrates superior effort
·            Course content mastery
8—9 Good Quality Work
·            Exceeds course requirements
·            Demonstrates commendable effort
·            Good course content knowledge
6—7 Acceptable Quality Work
·            Meets course requirements
·            Demonstrates acceptable effort
·            Acceptable course content knowledge
0—5 Unacceptable Quality Work
·            Fails to meet course requirements
·            Incomplete or unacceptable effort
·            Poor course content knowledge

Since my first class, I have really appreciated Dr. Newberry’s rubric scale of grading our weekly participation within the framework of our engagement with the material and each other. While I am not sure it would motivate every one of my students, the differentiation between the 10 (perfect score) and the 8-9 good quality work pushes me to delve deeper into the material and engagement than I might otherwise because I want the top score. As the expectations are clear to students they can work to achieve at their desired level and impact their grade in that way.
Method 2: Self-evaluation of their performance in the course – team project. Having students answer a question like, “What is the most important thing you contributed throughout the course of this project?” allows students to synthesize the work that they have completed; what they share as their most important take away allows you to see what they truly learned over the course of the project and evaluate their contributions to the team as a whole.
When combined with peer-evaluations and the components of the work that the team pulled together over the course of the project, this component of the grade makes for an additional fair way to assess participation.
5.     Define peer evaluation and describe its advantages and disadvantages.
Peer evaluation: a structured process by which students participating in the same course evaluate alone, in pairs, or in teams the work of another student or set of students.

One of the advantages of peer evaluation is that peer evaluators often have more time to give quality feedback. (This is especially helpful when the class size is large. Yay for me as I have 85 students in my AP stats class next year… 3 cheers for peer evaluation!)


Hip, hip, hooray!                          Hip, hip, hooray!                                Hip, hip, hooray!

                                 


Peer reviews, especially when structured in the online environment, allow students to take their time and put together thoughtful, well-articulated feedback.                        
Disadvantages of peer evaluation arise when it is structured into teamwork as many times, students object strongly to any part of their grade being determined by the work of another.
6.     Describe a possible group assignment for an online class and explain how to evaluate student performance in the group assignment.
Assignment for AP Statistics:
Consider what we have studied in regards to evaluating data sets both in isolation and in comparison to one another. You are going to write the lead story in a newspaper on a topic of your choice. With your teammates, you will collect a minimum of two real sets of data that you will present in both diagram form and interpret for the reader. It’s your job to convince the reader that a) the topic matters to them, b) the topic is newsworthy and c) that it is presented in a way that they understand the applications of the data to themselves and/or their family members. Be sure to cite the sources of your real data in your write up. All diagrams should be professional quality, remember they are the main source of the data trends of which you are trying to convince your readers.
You will be evaluated on the final product, the quality of the writing, relevance of the data chosen, and the creativity of presentation.
Additionally, each team member will fill out a self-evaluation and a peer evaluation.
Your self-evaluation will answer the question: what did you contribute to the success of the group? Rate your work according to the rubric below:
10 Excellent Quality Work
·            Far exceeds course requirements
·            Demonstrates superior effort
·            Course content mastery
8—9 Good Quality Work
·            Exceeds course requirements
·            Demonstrates commendable effort
·            Good course content knowledge
6—7 Acceptable Quality Work
·            Meets course requirements
·            Demonstrates acceptable effort
·            Acceptable course content knowledge
0—5 Unacceptable Quality Work
·            Fails to meet course requirements
·            Incomplete or unacceptable effort
·            Poor course content knowledge

Your peer-evaluation will answer the question: what did each of your group members contribute to the success of the group? Rate the work of each teammate according to the rubric below:
10 Excellent Quality Work
·            Far exceeds course requirements
·            Demonstrates superior effort
·            Course content mastery
8—9 Good Quality Work
·            Exceeds course requirements
·            Demonstrates commendable effort
·            Good course content knowledge
6—7 Acceptable Quality Work
·            Meets course requirements
·            Demonstrates acceptable effort
·            Acceptable course content knowledge
0—5 Unacceptable Quality Work
·            Fails to meet course requirements
·            Incomplete or unacceptable effort
·            Poor course content knowledge

7.     Create an online test.
Go to http://quizstar.4teachers.org , create a student account and search for the class name “AP Stats – Period 3”. I am listed under Michelle Romanek-Beyronneau and it’s a sample quiz for title. For your convenience I have screen captured the quiz image below:
8.     Create a rubric or other grading aide for an online assignment.

One of the most challenging aspects of the AP exam is the face that each of the distractors from the correct answer is SO well thought out. One of the key skills that I need to develop in my students is the ability to evaluate each of the available answers and understand where they may be coming from. This short answer quiz will be graded according to the following rubric:

1 – correct identification of an incorrect answer; poor or incorrect reasoning/argument/explanation for choice

2 – correct identification of an incorrect answer; weak reasoning/argument/explanation for choice

3 – correct identification of an incorrect answer; moderately well reasoned argument/explanation for choice

4 – correct identification of an incorrect answer; exemplary argument/explanation for choice