Learner-Content
|
Learner-Instructor
|
Learner-Learner
|
|
Video Presentation
|
X
|
||
Lecture
|
X
|
||
Chat
|
X
|
X
|
|
Discussion
|
X
|
X
|
|
Slideshow
|
X
|
||
Online Readings
|
X
|
||
Story by a Teacher
|
X
|
||
Field Trips
|
X
|
||
Worksheet
|
X
|
X
|
|
Lab
|
X
|
X
|
|
Case Study
|
X
|
X
|
|
Mock Trial
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Reading Eggspress
(online gaming
situations/quizzes)
|
X
|
X
|
|
Stories by learners
|
X
|
||
Scavenger Hunts
|
X
|
X
|
|
Real world activities: i.e.
building a clinometer and using the angle of sight to determine the height of
a building on campus
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
B. Discuss of the types of interactions that are most often used in the
content area for which you expect to design instruction. Be sure to explain the
content area, the types of students and types of objectives with which you will
be working.
Content Area: My expected content area would be any
mathematics taught at the high school level. This material ranges from
pre-algebra up through AP Statistics or AP Calculus.
Types of Students: The type of
students would vary widely from course to course as the students taking a
pre-algebra course to strengthen their skills would have a very different set
of conditions to consider in contrast to students taking online AP Statistics.
Therefore, for the purposes of these answers, I will respond from the frame of
my proposed course in my last blog. Therefore, the
students this course is targeted to reach would be students (most likely 9th
graders who will be 10th graders in the following year or 10th
graders who will be 11th graders in the following year) who for one
reason or another would like to advance through Honors Algebra 2 over the
summer to enable them to take Honors Pre-Calculus in the following school year.
To engage in the course, they would need to be recommended by their previous
math teachers as not only having excellent base math skills (Algebra 1
particularly), but they would also need to be motivated, hard workers and have
access to the technology components necessary to complete the online course.
(Library access would be fine, but they need to have a prepared plan of attack
to participate.)
Learning Objectives: The
objective of this course would be to have students master the following topics
to be used and applied in subsequent courses (math and otherwise, perhaps in
Bruce’s automotive systems course!):
Building
on their work with linear, quadratic, and exponential functions, students
extend their repertoire of functions to include polynomial, rational, and
radical functions. Students work closely with the expressions that define the
functions, and continue to expand and hone their abilities to model situations
and to solve equations, including solving quadratic equations over the set of
complex numbers and solving exponential equations using the properties of
logarithms. The five main units are:
·
Polynomial, Rational and Radical Relationships
·
Trigonometric Functions
·
Modeling with Functions
·
Inferences and Conclusions from Data
·
Applications of Probability
Learner-content: Students
would be expected to engage with the content in several ways throughout the
course. The coursework would consist of podcasts of material, viewing of power
points, and required readings in the book. These materials would then be used
by the students to engage in the production of work that demonstrates their
understanding of the material. Their work could be done by hand, creating
online responses in an interface, creation of power points, prezis or videos
demonstrating understanding and application.
Learner-instructor: Students
interaction with the instructor would come through appointed guaranteed “office
hours” for synchronous chat, discussion boards where requests for help,
clarification, and enhancement of understandings or extensions could be
discussed. Additionally, students would interact with the instructor when
turning in work for assessment.
Learner-learner: While I feel
like this interaction should be maximized, the format of the course (an
advancement course for 9th and 10th graders) and the fact
that it must be approved by the school district, making too much required work
in the learner-learner interaction would overwhelm the students. While this
work will be minimized, students will interact on the discussion boards a
minimum of once per assignment cluster (this works out to an average of 10
times per unit) by sharing a particular problem or general problem that they a)
continue to find difficult or b) were finding repetitively difficult but have
since made a breakthrough and share that breakthrough. Students would then have
a minimum required interaction of 3 responses to their peers to force them to
look through the difficulties or aha’s of others as they are likely to overlap
and have a good chance to gain understanding from each other. For subsequent
iterations of the course, after success has been proven, I’d love to start
incorporating a group project about midway through that requires them to
synthesize the first half of the class into an application problem. I would
expect this requirement to have little to no support from administration before
the class has run through successfully to show that it can be done.
C. Chapters 2, 3 and 4 of the Horton text discuss three categories of
activities: Absorb, Do, and Connect. After reading these chapters you are to
locate one or more online classes and identify one Absorb, one Do and one
Connect activity. Present your findings using this format:
URL:
|
More generically:
|
||||||||||||||
Course Content:
|
The world is full of
uncertainty: accidents, storms, unruly financial markets, noisy
communications. The world is also full of data. Probabilistic modeling and
the related field of statistical inference are the keys to analyzing data and
making scientifically sound predictions.
Probabilistic models use
the language of mathematics. But instead of relying on the traditional
"theorem - proof" format, we develop the material in an intuitive
-- but still rigorous and mathematically precise -- manner. Furthermore,
while the applications are multiple and evident, we emphasize the basic
concepts and methodologies that are universally applicable.
The course covers all of
the basic probability concepts, including:
•
multiple discrete
or continuous random variables, expectations, and conditional distributions
•
laws of large
numbers
•
the main tools of
Bayesian inference methods
•
an introduction
to random processes (Poisson processes and Markov chains)
The contents of this
course are essentially the same as those of the corresponding MIT class (Probabilistic
Systems Analysis and Applied Probability) -- a course that has been
offered and continuously refined over more than 50 years. It is a challenging
class, but it will enable you to apply the tools of probability theory to
real-world applications or your research.
|
||||||||||||||
Instructor Characteristics:
|
This
course has 7 people “on staff” all connected with MIT.
The lead instructors are John Tsitsiklis and Patrick Jaillet; both resident
instructors at MIT in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer
Science. It would seem reasonable to assume that both possess high levels of
technological skill. Their online teaching experience, however, is unclear,
so their ability to apply their knowledge and experience to an online format
could only be evaluated by gaining additional information or taking the
class.
The other 5 people working to monitor the course are either graduate students
in the same department (3) or recent graduates of the same dept. (2). The
same assumptions of technological skill and online teaching experience will be
made.
|
||||||||||||||
Intended Students/Probable Student Characteristics:
|
The edx website states: EdX courses are open to
everyone. All you need is access to a computer with a current browser and an
Internet connection and, of course, a desire to learn.
This particular course has the following prerequisites: College-level
calculus (single-variable and multivariable). Although this is not a
mathematics course, it does rely on the language and some tools from
mathematics. It requires a level of comfort with mathematical reasoning,
familiarity with sequences, limits, infinite series, the chain rule, as well
as the ability to work with ordinary or multiple integrals.
Combining all of that together, I would expect that a student taking this
course is self-motivated (their only reward is knowledge), has a high level
of comfort with technology and mathematics.
|
||||||||||||||
Identify the Type of Activity: Absorb - Do - Connect
|
|
||||||||||||||
Identify and Discuss the Interactions in the Activity:
|
It is my understanding that
they have tried to make this course as similar as the face-to-face offering of
the course at MIT. So:
1)
The course is
organized along units that are aligned with the chapters of the textbook that
is required for the course.
2)
Each unit has
from 1 to 3 lecture sequences.
3)
These lectures
are series of short video clips intermixed with short test problems to test the
understanding of the previous material presented.
4)
Each unit also
consists of multiple options of supplementary material designed to clarify,
enhance or extend the learning and understanding for that unit.
5)
Discussion boards
for students to interact both with other students to work through problems
together and/or seek clarification from the teachers are monitored on a regular
basis.
6)
There are 11
weekly homework assignments which students work through to master the material
and demonstrate this mastery to the teachers.
7)
There are 2
midterm exams and 1 final exam to test what the students have learned through
the course of the class.
|
Live long and prosper,
Michelle
Michelle
Very specific post. I learned extensive knowledge from it.
ReplyDeleteLimin,
DeleteI'm glad you felt like my post brought you some new info.
Thanks!
Michelle
Hi Michelle,
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. I really like to read your post.Your post contains many details and organization so I learned a lot. Thanks for sharing.
Chun Yi Huang
Thanks Chun!
DeleteI really like seeing the organization that others use, too. Dr. Newberry always gives us just enough guidance and I think it's so clear and then I'm amazed by the variety of answers our class shares.
Michelle
Hi,
ReplyDeleteYou gave a very thorough explanation about the course that you are going to design. I thought you did an excellent job in providing the course objectives,as well as student and teacher characteristics. I also like how you incorporated into your discussion ways that this course is typically taught, but you gave your own twist to it. Really nicely done.
Thanks Ebony. I've seen some online courses designed that tried I take everything from the traditional face to face class and translate it right into the online format. I think this really takes away from the opportunity we have in this kind of development to break free of some of the molds to which we have set ourselves.
ReplyDeleteCheers!
Michelle
Nice, Michelle! I liked your activities that engaged all three interaction profiles. I would never have thought of Mock Trials! I also liked your example of building a clinometer!
ReplyDeleteAs a huge fan of role-playing games, I was particularly excited to see my favorite polyhedra in the header image of your chosen course on "The Science of Uncertainty". (I had to chop off part of your link to get there, however. I used: https://www.edx.org/course/mitx/mitx-6-041x-introduction-probability-1296)
Looks like the Connect activities are similar to what we are doing for this course.
Nice job! Very detailed, very thorough, and very interesting! Thanks for a great post!
Thanks! I only thought of mock trials because we did them in my AP US History class in high school and I LOVED them.
DeleteAlso, as a math teacher, I'm thrilled to see anyone using the phrase, "my favorite polyhedra."
Thanks for the positive feedback!
Michelle
Love the Star Trek!
ReplyDeleteThanks Dr. Newberry! It's my thing. :-D
DeleteHey Michelle,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your Learner-Learner commentary. As I read and interact with fellow scholars in this class as well as my ETCS classes, I am getting a better understanding of the constraints in the K-12 systems. Your explanation of the discussion activity led me to investigate “Do” activities on the Horton Portfolio site and I’m wondering if a case study
http://www.horton.com/portfoliocasestudy.htm
type of activity would be appropriate. I’m imagining the scenario would relate some type of problem that had various possible outcomes, and students could offer up solutions and brainstorm with one another. By the way, I carefully read the “Spock-like” explanation of your first URL. Very well written. I actually followed it!
Peace be with you.
Bruce
Hey Bruce!
DeleteThat is exactly the kind of activity that I need. The only difficulty is that I could see there being pushback from other teachers or admin in the district because not everyone likes group work. It would have to be an optional activity in lieu of something else.
Thanks!
Michelle
Hi Michelle,
ReplyDeleteBecause I like the mathematics, I enjoyed while I read your post. Your post is very well organized and I could understand easily about this week's topic through your imaginary math class. Was your major math? When you design your math class in practice, are you gonna work with SME?
Hello!
DeleteI'm glad you like math; most people usually back away from me while talking in a calm voice when I tell them that I'm a math teacher... My college major was math, but that wouldn't preclude me from working with someone who has more expertise than myself. Likely, this would be a person like my colleague at work who has his masters in math. I would be surprised to see the district paying an outside SME for their time to develop my one course...
Michelle